Curriculum and Instruction in North Carolina's middle level schools have been
greatly
influenced by the school accountability movement. One positive result of the
drive for greater
accountability is that teachers are more focused on the curriculum and are ensuring
that they are
teaching what is tested—the objectives of the North Carolina Standard Course
of Study. On the
other hand, there is much concern over the effects of " high-stakes testing"
on children, adults,
and the overall school climate. Many teachers have expressed concerns over losing
the
"teachable moment" in the race to cover the materials that will be on the state
test. A recent
study by Ken McEwin, Melanie Greene, and Doris Jenkins (2001) from Appalachian
State
University shows a significant reduction in time spent on subjects that are
not currently tested.
It is the recommendation of the task force that:
- Middle level schools continue the strong emphasis on teaching the
core subjects with
significant amounts of instructional time being devoted to English language
arts, math,
science, and social studies. The current trend towards under-teaching science
and social
studies must be reversed.
- The required healthful living curriculum
as well as a variety of elective courses including
arts education, second languages, and career and technical
education are important and
should be available to all students.
- The curriculum, based on the North
Carolina Standard Course of Study, must be
comprehensive and challenging, and allow for the acceleration of learning at
all levels.
Greater emphasis is needed on higher-level academics and intellectual development
so
that students become responsible partners and participants in their own learning.
Teachers
must receive ongoing training in new taxonomies and instructional strategies
to improve
student learning.
- Teachers must be highly qualified
and knowledgeable about the importance and
relevance of all content areas as well as their inter-relatedness and
connections across
disciplines. Teachers must integrate content knowledge and skills across the
curriculum.
- Educators must recognize that reading comprehension is
fundamental to success in
middle school. Special attention must be given to reading comprehension and
writing
skills in all areas. (Also note Educator Preparation section).
- Classrooms
should provide student-centered learning based on high expectations and the
North Carolina Standard Course of Study. Greater emphasis must be made
to ensure that
middle level students are actively involved in their own learning. The learning
process of
conceptual development is supported by Socratic dialogue, cooperative
learning, and
independent research.
- Teachers will use continuous, appropriate, and
authentic assessment and evaluation to
determine if students have mastered the objectives in the North Carolina
Standard
Course of Study and to provide information to students, teachers, and family
members to
plan further learning. Some examples of these assessments include the following:
informal checks for understanding; traditional quizzes and tests; interviews;
questionnaires; conferences; performance tasks; projects; simulations; formal
debates;
exhibitions; position papers; scientific experiments; individual and group projects;
rubrics; and portfolios.
- Educators must identify, appreciate, and celebrate
growth and achievement of students,
and be particularly careful to note the improvement of all students working
below grade
level. Students demonstrating significant improvement should be noticed and
celebrated.
Some examples of achievement to recognize and celebrate include the following:
attendance, bringing up grades, growth made on end-of-grade tests, and honor
roll.
Throughout the meetings of the task force, the sentiments described by the
participants strongly
echoed the National Middle School Association's position statement (NMSA, 1999)
on diversity.
The Association
values diversity and views differences as a vital, positive,
and enriching force in
the continued development of society and especially in the educational processes
of schools. Diversity is a symbol of strength and a positive force, which
encompasses differences that make each of us unique. While recognizing the
importance of our similarities, diversity is the understanding that through
those
differences each person brings a unique and important perspective to life.
North Carolina was recognized by Education Week (Viadero, 2000) as
being in the vanguard of
states making an effort to reduce the disparity in achievement levels between
white and minority
students. Education Week noted that the state did not want to "close the gap"
by holding any
children back, but instead by ensuring that all students were successful.
Yet, despite the increased focus on issues of diversity over the last several
years, and the
dramatic progress being made in eliminating disparities based on race and socioeconomic
status,
there is still a long way to go. New challenges, such as the tremendous growth
in our Hispanic
communities and the accompanying explosion in English as a Second Language programs,
have
only strengthened the importance of diversity as a "front-burner" issue and
necessity in our state.
It is the recommendation of the task force that:
- Middle level educators have the knowledge and skills to
respond effectively to the
diversity found in young adolescents. This issue addresses
not only physical, social,
intellectual, and emotional development, but also cultural, ethnic, and linguistic
differences. Middle level teachers must incorporate best practices addressing
diversity
into planning and implementing curriculum, and in the differentiating of instruction.
-
School districts, individual schools, and institutions of higher education should
expand
pre-service, induction, and career staff development for all middle level educators
to
include the knowledge, skills, and dispositions needed to support the learning
of all
students; including students with limited English proficiency, students from
varying
socioeconomic, ethnic/cultural backgrounds, academically and intellectually
gifted, and
exceptional needs children. Attention must be paid to the National Council for
Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE, 2001) Standards on Diversity and
Equity.
- Emphasis must be placed on providing a rigorous, accelerated
(when possible) and
enriched academic experience for ALL students. It is of paramount importance
that
students at all levels of achievement and in all reported sub-groups show growth,
with
particular attention being paid to increasing the growth of our highest and
lowest
performing students. Middle level schools must reduce academic tracking
that creates
19 permanently fixed performance levels, recognizing the intent of the state's
Academically
or Intellectually Gifted Program to increase access to challenging and rigorous
courses
and activities. The task force recognizes that short-term flexible grouping
of students to
address specific curriculum needs is NOT tracking.
- The task force endorses
and affirms the recommendations and actions of the North
Carolina Advisory Commission on Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps, and strongly
encourages school districts, individual schools, and institutes of higher education
to
support their efforts.
Several recent reports from the Southern Region Education Board (1998, 1999)
assert that state
policy needs to send a clear message through licensing and certification that
teacher quality in
the middle grades is a priority. These studies also challenge states to provide
incentives and
remove barriers to increase the quality of teacher preparation.
Other studies have pointed out that one of the most critical elements affecting
student learning is
the quality of the classroom teacher (Education Commission of the States, 2000).
The federal
mandates of No Child Left Behind require teachers who are highly qualified in
their content area.
The task force believes that teachers must also be prepared to successfully
teach young
adolescents. North Carolina is regarded throughout the nation as being in the
forefront of middle
grades education, and many of our country's preeminent middle level educators
and researchers
have ties to the state. While the state has reason to be proud of our long history
and
contributions to the field, the fact remains that there is a desperate shortage
of teachers at the
middle level. Most colleges and universities across the state have small departments
that do not
begin to approach turning out the number of teachers needed at the middle grades.
In 2000, only
245 middle grades education students were graduated from North Carolina's public
and private
universities and colleges. These 245 graduates represent just 7% of the annual
pool of new
teachers coming from our state's undergraduate programs. The task force believes
that it is
imperative that the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, colleges
and universities,
the North Carolina Middle School Association, and other interested stakeholders
make a
commitment to promote middle grades education as a career path.
It is the recommendation of the task force that:
- The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction and
local school districts should
require middle school professional development focusing on young adolescents,
middle
schools and best practices for all teachers who hold or are seeking lateral
entry or add-on
licenses at the middle level within their first year of teaching at the middle
level. For
example, high school teachers who receive an automatic add-on of middle grade
licensure (6-9) should receive preparation in meeting the needs of young adolescents
in
high performing middle level schools within one year of beginning their teaching
at the
middle level.
- Undergraduate degree-seeking candidates should be required
to complete one teaching
concentration in the core areas of mathematics, science, social studies, or
English
language arts with an enhanced literacy component of reading, writing, or English
as a
Second Language. Two teaching concentrations in the core areas of mathematics,
science, social studies or English language arts are strongly encouraged. If
an institution
of higher education chooses to require two teaching concentrations, the literacy
competencies must be met.
- Example One: A student may have an academic
concentration in mathematics,
science, social studies, or English language arts. In addition, the student
will also
have a literacy component of reading, writing, or English as a Second Language.
-
Example Two: A student may have an academic concentration in mathematics, and
another concentration in science. The student will also complete the literacy
competencies through this coursework.
- The current licensing
structure should be changed to better reflect the needs of young
adolescent learners to K-5, 5-8, and 9-12. Note that the overlap at grade five
is
intentional, and addresses the fact that the transitional nature of the fifth
grade may
appropriately be addressed through either elementary or middle school licensure.
Ninth
grade, in the vast majority of schools in this state, is no longer contained
in middle or
elementary school, and ninth graders, while benefiting from many aspects of
middle
school philosophy, should be taught by those with high school licensure. The
task force
will delay discussions of this recommendation until after the June 30, 2006
mandated
requirements for highly qualified teachers for No Child Left Behind are implemented.
-
The Commission on Teacher Quality should develop standards for literacy (reading
comprehension, writing, and English as a Second Language) to ensure that all
teachers
develop the knowledge and needed skills.
Most elements of education reform at the elementary, middle, and high school
level have focused
on curriculum, instruction, and testing issues. Middle level educators are
aware that relationships
do matter, and form a critical link between the teacher and the student, and
between the student
and his/her team. Research demonstrates that students do try harder and achieve
more if they
believe that their teacher is interested in their success and if they feel
they are part of a group of
peers and adults who support each other in their efforts to achieve (Goodenow,
1993). Likewise,
research also shows that students who feel "left-out" of the process, who
feel that their success
does not matter, or that their teachers believe them incapable of academic
success, will lower
their own expectations accordingly (Kraner, 1992). It is the classic "self-fulfilling
prophecy" in
action. Half a century of research also tells us that teachers who believe
their students are bright
and capable will have higher achieving classrooms than those who believe their
children are not
high achievers (Arnold, 2001).
Given that we know the importance of teacher-student relationships to student
success, it is
critical that middle level schools are organized in ways that maximize the
creation and growth of
high-achieving, supportive, learning communities. Schools organized around
the middle school
concept of the team quite simply achieve more; have better attendance, and
have fewer discipline
problems than schools that do not use teams (Pounder, 1998). A recent important
study of
education in North Carolina's middle grades found that schools recognized
as "exemplary" by
the state's accountability program are more likely to have an organizational
culture that reflects
middle school philosophy (McEwin, Greene, & Jenkins, 2001). The use of
teaming and
interdisciplinary teaching, flexible scheduling, and an emphasis
on de-tracking students is not
only good for adolescent development, but also for high achieving and high
performing schools.
It is the recommendation of the task force that:
- Middle level schools have an advisory program to address
the academic, social,
emotional, and citizenship development of responsible young adolescents. The
curriculum and instruction of this program must be carefully planned, articulated,
and
implemented. Administrators, teachers, counselors, and other staff must understand
and
contribute to the school's plan for and implementation of its student advocacy,
guidance,
and advisory program. Every middle level student will have an adult advocate.
-
Middle level administrators, teachers, counselors, and other staff have the
knowledge,
skills, and display dispositions reflecting middle level organization and
philosophy. To
this end, district and school administrators will require and support middle
level principal
and staff participation in professional development activities—both in-service
and
conference—focused on middle level organization, philosophy, practices, and
assessment. To achieve this, the task force encourages the consideration of
an additional
five days of employment at regular salary for middle level staff to provide
training on
middle school organization, programs, and practices.
- Middle level
schools will look at what teachers, students, parents/ community, test scores,
and other data, say about the performance of the whole school, and of groups
within the
school. If there are differences, the next step is to examine the curriculum
and instruction
practices that affect each group of students, keeping in mind that the North
Carolina
Standard Course of Study represents a minimum set of requirements,
and that all students
should be challenged and grow.
- Middle level schools have a "living"
School Improvement Plan that ensures every
student's success and is focused on effective middle school research. Expectations
for
middle level organization, staffing, administration, curriculum and instruction,
special
programs, student activities, assessment/evaluation, and parental involvement
will be
addressed. It is not sufficient to set goals for improved test scores if those
increases come
at the expense of a quality middle level experience for all students.
-
Middle level teachers, in order to maximize the teaching/learning process,
must have the
structure and flexibility in the schedule that provide opportunities for teacher
collaboration and planning to focus on:
- Curriculum alignment
-
Reading and writing across the curriculum
- Integrated/interdisciplinary
instruction across all content areas
- Development of policies concerning
instruction, homework, assessment and
evaluation, discipline, etc. that can be consistently implemented across all
content
areas
- Vertical articulation with elementary and
high school
- Middle level schools must recognize the importance
of individual and team planning time
and keep such time inviolate. Teachers, like other professionals, require
protected time in
which to plan. Middle level educators need, and must wisely utilize a "team-planning"
time during the instructional day.
Many educators and researchers have stated the obvious point that involvement
by parents,
family, and the community has a profound impact on student success (Henderson
and Berla,
1994). Regardless of race, socioeconomic, or other factors, students who
have significant adults
actively involved in their education are more successful than those whose
parents are not
involved. A large body of research supports the fact that parents—even those
very active in the
elementary school—become scarcer at the middle level. Over 90% of parents
in a recent survey
believed that distancing themselves from direct involvement in their child's
schoolwork was an
important part of maturation. Some parents become intimidated by the increasing
difficulty of
coursework at the middle level. Still others may not have had positive middle
school experiences
themselves. To engage parents and the community in meaningful ways, effort
must be made to
lower existing barriers. To clear these barriers requires constant and effective
efforts on the part
of the school to reach out to the school community. Forming partnerships
is an essential part of
that outreach. In addition, it is essential that partnerships are formed
among and between key
players in the school, business, and other communities.
It is the recommendation of the task force that:
- Teams and teachers in the middle school are the primary
partner with parents in their child's school. Schools and teachers can cultivate
parent involvement by preparing teachers and teams to include, communicate with,
and respond effectively to parents.
- School Improvement Plans must address
the active involvement of parents and extended family members in their child's
educational learning experience. Conscientious and strategic efforts should be
made to educate parents on how children learn, the middle school concept, the
nature of young adolescents, and specific instructional program opportunities.
-
Schools should provide ample opportunities for parent involvement in their child's
education. Some ways schools can encourage parents to be involved include tutoring,
mentoring, taking part in career development plans, grade level or team parents,
direct communication with their child's teachers, school committees, Parent Teacher
Association, and Parent Teacher Organization.
- Local districts will develop
plans to establish partnerships at the local education level within school attendance
zones to provide seamless transitions from elementary to middle school and from
middle to high school and post-secondary institutions.
- The North Carolina
Department of Public Instruction, in conjunction with the North Carolina Middle
School Association and North Carolina Parent Teacher Association will establish
a state Middle School Council, with regular meetings, inclusive of policy makers,
educators, family, community groups and agencies, and businesses to advocate for
best practices in middle level education.
- School districts are encouraged
to forge collaborative connections that are persistent and flexible among schools,
families, communities, businesses, and institutions of higher education. These
connections should provide students and family access to services, career exploration
opportunities, expand learning beyond regular school hours and outside of school
walls, and advocate for school improvements critical to ensuring success for every
student at all levels.
- School districts are expected to develop a meaningful
two-way communication process that is interactive and integrated. Multiple strategies
such as public forums, focus groups, community forums, use of technology, web
pages, newsletters, speaker's bureaus, communication with community centers and
faith-based institutions, and other means can be utilized to promote communication
about middle level education among all stakeholders.
<< Back
| Table of Contents | Next
>>