

ACADEMICALLY OR INTELLECTUALLY GIFTED
Academically gifted students are defined as those who demonstrate or have the potential to demonstrate outstanding intellectual aptitude and specific academic ability. In order to develop their abilities, these students may require differentiated educational services beyond those ordinarily provided by the regular school program (Section .1505, Procedures Governing Programs and Services for Children With Special Needs).
For a more detailed definition of academically gifted students.
TOPICS
NOTE :: Various file formats are used on this page that may require download. If larger than 1mb, it will take longer to download. For instructions or more information, please visit our download page.
Academically or Intellectually Gifted
(AIG) Coordinators' Institute
Implementing Article 9B: Research-Based Service Delivery and
Effective Program Practices
Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Forum Leaders
(ppt, 132kb)
American Association
for Gifted Children
AIG Tuition Reimbursement
Limited tuition awards are available for education teachers working toward AIG Licensure.
Budget
State and Federal Per Child Allocations for Children with Disabilities and Academically
and Intellectually Gifted.
Child Count
Academically or intellectually gifted by LEA and ethnicity.
Gifted Policy Analysis Study for the Ohio Department of Education Final Report
October 31, 2003
A policy review study across five states to determine the nature, extent,
and relative success of policies governing programs for the gifted conducted
by The
Center for Gifted Education at the College of William and Mary.
(pdf, 468kb)
Guidelines: Governing Local Plans for Gifted Education
The guidelines for the development of local plans incorporate components
of the statute and serve as suggestions for best practice. They provide
some statewide consistency in the education of academically or intellectually
gifted students.
(pdf, 284kb)
AIG Students End-of-Grade (EOG)
- Rank Order of LEA's for AIG Students End-of-Grade (EOG) by Five Year Math Performance
Mean Scores
- Includes individual math mean scores from 2000 to 2004 with total
number of AIG students in each LEA (pdf, 52kb)
In addition, data on member of AIG students scoring at Level 1, 2, 3 and 4 for each year from 2000 to 2004 are given. - Includes individual reading mean scores from 2000 to 2004 with total number of
AIG students in each LEA (pdf, 52kb)
In addition, data on member of AIG students scoring at Level 1, 2, 3 and 4 for each year from 2000 to 2004 are given.
- Includes individual math mean scores from 2000 to 2004 with total
number of AIG students in each LEA (pdf, 52kb)
- AIG Charts
Trend of AIG Student End-of-Grade (EOG) Performance in grades 3-8. Mean Scores in Reading and Math: 1992-93 to 2003-04. Contains subgroup.
(pdf, 432kb)
Report on Increasing Opportunity to Learn via Access to Rigorous Courses and
Programs: One Strategy for Closing the Achievement Gap for at Risk and Ethnic
Minority Students
Results of a study conducted for the NC General Assembly detailing the level
of enrollment of minority students in academically/intellectually gifted programs,
honors courses and Advanced Placement (AP) courses across the state.
(pdf, 192kb)
Standards and Indicators Academically or Intellectually Gifted Add-On Licensure
Teacher education programs and field-based providers of professional development
should use these standards and indicators to plan, implement and deliver courses
leading to North Carolina add-on licensure in Academically or Intellectually
Gifted (AIG). These standards and indicators are aligned with those of the
Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), the National Council for Accreditation
of Teacher Education (NCATE), the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support
Consortium (INTASC) and the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards
(NBPTS). The INTASC standards, in particular, provided a strong framework for
developing these standards and indicators.
The "Non-Negotiables" of Academic Rigor
Rigorous academic environments represent
true communities of learning, encouraging both students and teachers to be
risk-takers
engaged
in experimental,
investigative
and open-ended learning processes.















